I had one of those liminal dreams this morning, where not just the strange immediate details of a fantasy, but an an entire alternate reality is taken for granted and then blows away like a dandelion puff as I awaken. I remember mainly the shape of the space where it used to be. There were many details, looming before me and in the dream’s background, but all I recall is a puzzle on a website and online obligations and promises I hadn’t honored. That so much of it involved something on the internet may indicate that “online” has become a part of reality as tangible as the street outside. The world-building of my dreams now includes an imaginary internet.
Which is not surprising, given that the internet is now the main “place” where so many of us work, play and communicate. Sometimes I feel as if we are moving towards E.M. Forster’s great science fiction short story “The Machine Stops.” Published in 1909, it describes a compartmentalized world of people living entirely within their homes, never touching each other, communicating, eating, living, via “the machine.”
And yet, I think if it were not for “the machine” of the internet, many of us would go mad from loneliness and boredom during this shut-down.
It’s important to be aware of the bad, but also the potential for good in any massive change. I first stepped into the internet more than thirty years ago, when it was a rarefied, shadowy world of black screens and pale text. Most of the people typing and posting in this unseriffed light green font were academics, so the level of discussion was the opposite of the stereotype now of the mindlessly malevolent troll. Debate online tended to be intellectual, detailed, multi-syllabic, and logical. To fail to cite, to back up your arguments, was considered embarrassing.
It wasn’t until the ’90s, when the doors were flung open and the multitudes descended, that willful stupidity and ignorance became assets. The internet was to be treated as either a marketplace or a playground, and only spoilsports violated netiquette by bringing up reality. This contempt for intelligence was still in play and evident when Scribophile went bright back in 2008. I can remember my first attempts at starting a serious discussion on the forum here being almost instantly derailed by deliberate nonsense. The reasoning seemed to be “It’s the internet! Get with the program Granny!” Serious discussions that lasted for more than ten pages were cause for unease and taken down, while threads consisting of little but gossip, fart jokes, and penis jokes went on for hundreds and hundreds of pages.
It’s improved. A little. The merits of moderated discussions are better understood today, but the real world consequences of celebrating dumbness on a massive scale, even for just a few years, are dire and long-lasting, and we are living with them.
My hope is that it’s been a learning process. My hope is that, now that so many of us are living online, now that so much of our welfare depends on the internet, enough of us have looked around at this environment and realized that intelligence and expertise are important. We’ve learned that ignoring people who weaponize stupidity does not make them go away; that the truth is not only worth defending but must be defended; that shaming callousness is not a waste of time; that irrationality and malice are not amusing, but dangerous.
Lessons like the above are almost always hard-won. How hard-won this one will be remains to be seen. The price we will ultimately pay for two decades of laughing and winking at liars depends on us.
